The End of Cursive

A number of Michigan schools are making cursive handwriting optional. I remember learning to write in “cursive” as opposed to “printing” somewhere around third grade. At the time (and even now) I never really understood why, after learning one perfectly good way of writing (and much more legible in my opinion), we then were basically told to forget it and move on to use cursive. But then, later on in my academic career, it was completely forgotten. What a waste of time. Printing, for me, was so much faster, so much easier to read. I could write upside down or sideways as need be, and I could always read it. The only thing I use cursive for is my signature, which has evolved into basically a longer version of my initials. Printing is just easier. There are too many intricacies to cursive and one wrong motion and you’ve got a different letter. So I’m happy in one sense that this useless (in my opinion) form of writing is going away. However to the point that handwriting in general is becoming useless – that I would save for another blog entry.

3 Responses to “The End of Cursive” »»

    comment_type != "trackback" && $comment->comment_type != "pingback" && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content) && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>
  1. Comment by newcott | 12/02/05 at 2:29 pm

    Cursive sucks. No point to it. Print and type are perfect substitutes. Cursive is The Man’s way of teaching kids early to live with boundaries, conform to society, and focus on mindless busywork. Cursive should be replaced with science experiments and nature walks.

  2. comment_type != "trackback" && $comment->comment_type != "pingback" && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content) && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>
  3. Comment by Ben Newton | 12/06/05 at 10:59 pm

    Oozy… Newcott…

    I expect more from you. Cursive is not useless. In the days when people actually wrote to each other on paper, instead of typing in half sentences and misspelled words, cursive was the fastest way to write. Not only that, but good cursive is much nicer looking than print. The problem is that none of us write anymore, and that is a shame (and I am as guilty as anyone). Our communications have been so distant and devoid of emotion, and that is having an effect on our society. Children today think that language is what they make it, and spelling and grammar are for nerds. People rarely take the time to communicate with intention and patience, but rather focus on quips and trivia. I think that is a detriment. Honestly, I hope that, as handwriting recognition and speech recognition get better, we go away from typing and back to speaking and writing, which is much better.

  4. comment_type != "trackback" && $comment->comment_type != "pingback" && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content) && !ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>
  5. Comment by oozy | 12/07/05 at 7:16 am

    I’d disagree that it’s faster to write. And it’s a lot harder to read. It may look nicer but that does little good if you can’t read it. I do agree that we are losing our skills of traditional communication – though I think this has more to do with the fact that I can instantly send someone a message, without thinking about what I’m writing, and less to do with the fact I can type it. It is amazing how much gibberish our unconscious mind is able to generate.

comment_type == "trackback" || $comment->comment_type == "pingback" || ereg("", $comment->comment_content) || ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>

Trackbacks/Pingbacks »»>

  1. Comment by newcott | 12/02/05 at 2:29 pm

    Cursive sucks. No point to it. Print and type are perfect substitutes. Cursive is The Man’s way of teaching kids early to live with boundaries, conform to society, and focus on mindless busywork. Cursive should be replaced with science experiments and nature walks.

  2. comment_type == "trackback" || $comment->comment_type == "pingback" || ereg("", $comment->comment_content) || ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>

    Trackbacks/Pingbacks »»>

    1. Comment by Ben Newton | 12/06/05 at 10:59 pm

      Oozy… Newcott…

      I expect more from you. Cursive is not useless. In the days when people actually wrote to each other on paper, instead of typing in half sentences and misspelled words, cursive was the fastest way to write. Not only that, but good cursive is much nicer looking than print. The problem is that none of us write anymore, and that is a shame (and I am as guilty as anyone). Our communications have been so distant and devoid of emotion, and that is having an effect on our society. Children today think that language is what they make it, and spelling and grammar are for nerds. People rarely take the time to communicate with intention and patience, but rather focus on quips and trivia. I think that is a detriment. Honestly, I hope that, as handwriting recognition and speech recognition get better, we go away from typing and back to speaking and writing, which is much better.

    2. comment_type == "trackback" || $comment->comment_type == "pingback" || ereg("", $comment->comment_content) || ereg("", $comment->comment_content)) { ?>

      Trackbacks/Pingbacks »»>

      1. Comment by oozy | 12/07/05 at 7:16 am

        I’d disagree that it’s faster to write. And it’s a lot harder to read. It may look nicer but that does little good if you can’t read it. I do agree that we are losing our skills of traditional communication – though I think this has more to do with the fact that I can instantly send someone a message, without thinking about what I’m writing, and less to do with the fact I can type it. It is amazing how much gibberish our unconscious mind is able to generate.


      Leave a Reply »»